I can't believe that came from your mouth!
Leftist Whackjob Guns Down Democrats at Safeway
Jared Lee Loughner attacked and killed several people, including a judge and attempted to murder a Democratic Congresswoman, Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.
And Loughner is a leftist loon who believed in mind control, the 2012 apocalypse, and was ejected from school by cops for incoherent babbling, which he obviously blamed on the school being unconstitutional or something.
From his YouTube screeds here:
If the police remove you from the educational facility for talking then removing you from the educational facility for talking is unconstitutional in the United States. The police remove you from the educational facility for talking. Thus, removing you from the educational facility for talking is unconstitutional in the United States. This situation is fraud because the police are unconstitutional!
Every police officer in the United States as of now is unconstitutionally working. Pima Community College police are police in the United States. Therefore, Pima Community College police are unconstitutionally working. The police are unconstitutionally working!
His YouTube videos are full of these types of self-affirming circular logic statements- and none of them make any sense to me.
Matt Drudge earlier tonight linked to a woman’s Twitter feed who described him as a leftist loon who was a total pothead. Here is a copy of her tweets:
While I am usually the first to point blame at leftists who hypocritically perform violent acts against their own kind, I must say that this is not a political attack. The actions of Jared Lee Loughner are typical of schizophrenic paranoids, and his actions will likely land him, if not in prison for life, then in a mental ward for a very long time.
He took a semi-automatic weapon to a grocery store with the intent to kill as many people as he could and succeeded in killing at least 6. He tried to join the Army but:
A senior military official told ABC News Loughner attempted to join the Army but “never made it past the urinalysis.”
Would I support drug testing as a condition of owning firearms? Um, yep.
Like This Post? Rate it and tell your friends! Click the Share button below.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Dr. Jones on January 9, 2011 at 2:09 am, and is filed under Bizarre, Crime, Politics, Stupid People, terror. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 1 year ago
I don’t have any problem whatsoever identifying it as a political attack. Hell that’s what it clearly was, however schizophrenic or paranoid it also clearly was. He was obviously influenced by leftist politics of the looniest kind. I would also point out that Marcos Moulitsos, for all his self-serving rhetoric about Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck singling out Giffords and “targeting” her district, Moulitsos himself targeted her for a primary contest. The reason he gave, right on Daily Kos, is that Giffords as a Blue Dog Democrat wasn’t progressive enough to suit him.
So why doesn’t the little punk son-of-a-bitch man up and accept responsibility for his actions? I say he’s responsible for the guy shooting Giffords and killing those other people, including a nine year old girl.
As for Hanoi Jane Fonda, her skank ass should still be tried for treason and hung by the neck until dead. She just needs to shut the fuck up.
I don’t agree with drug testing for gun ownership either. It sounds reasonable, but as long as there are democrats with the slightest influence, some of them somewhere will decide Twinkies, soda pop, coffee, or cigarettes is a drug that might render a person incapable of exercising gun ownership. For that matter, you could be judged by your environment. Too much pollution might be deemed to potentially have an effect on your judgment.
I hate these people with a purple passion, and I’m not giving them so much as an inch. You shouldn’t either.
about 1 year ago
As far as drug testing for gun ownership, I am harkening back to the Cho shooting here in Virginia. It has long been part of the background checks to screen for mental impairment. A positive urinalysis for marijuana should be an equal disqualifier-
marijuana has been linked to causing severe delusions and psychosis in some people, and this guy was an apparent marijuana addict and completely out of his tree. Yes, liberal values (oxymoron) dictate that smoking pot is just fine, but I am leaning more towards the influence of pot contributing to the psychotic episode than toward any other political influence.
about 1 year ago
A few things here. 1) Another of his former classmates said he got upset and called her a terrorist for having an abortion (not to many left wingers do that, none that I can think of). 2) He did target a democratic congresswoman. 3) A lot of people on the far right smoke pot, hell, Pat Robertson just came out a couple weeks ago and said there should be far less punishment for it (course he is to the left of you). I don’t think this guy was right, left, or center… just off his rocker.