Kid Executes Cross-Dressing Poof in Class in Front of Witnesses and Jury Can’t Convict
Ah Los Angeles. The city where liberalism is so rampant, that when a jury is handed an open and shut case of premeditated murder against a crossdressing child, the jury can’t decide to convict. And now we have the hilarious new defense for execution style murder known as “gay panic.”
From the LATimes here:
A jury has been unable to reach a verdict in the murder trial of Brandon McInerney, the 17-year-old accused of shooting a gay classmate to death in 2008.
The jury began deliberating Friday, weighing eight weeks of testimony in a trial that included nearly 100 witnesses. Many of those testifying were students and teachers at E.O. Green Junior High School in Oxnard who saw tensions on campus rising after 15-year-old Larry King began coming to school dressed in makeup and girl’s boots.
McInerney, then 14, shot King twice in the back of the head in a school computer lab on Feb. 12, 2008. The prosecution says it was a calculated murder carried out in part because McInerney was exploring white supremacist ideology and didn’t like homosexuals.
Defense attorneys painted a different picture, that of a bright but abused 14-year-old who snapped after being sexually harassed by King.
In liberal dogma, its just fine that a young boy suddenly wants to wear makeup and start propositioning other boys for sexual intercourse, and teachers won’t step in and stop such behavior, much less make the child get counselling to find out what adults have been molesting him to prompt such acting out. And when another child, shaken by the feelings provoked by the behavior, puts an end to the situation, liberals have the gall to act shocked.
The jury may be hung, but there will probably be a retrial. In the mean time, don’t shed any tears for Larry King. He got to go to gay heaven to be with Matthew Shephard who died on the fence for all gay sins.
I believe this case was manslaughter (7 jurors agreed with me) because Lawrence Fobes King harassed other boys & I wouldn’t be surprised if Lawrence Fobes King committed physical abuse against Brandon James McInerney only that it went unreported. Also it would not surprise me if Lawrence Fobes King molested children because we know what went reported.
Here’s what predictably the Daily Kos and other media left out. Lawrence Fobes King exposed himself and harassed other boys for sex in the bathroom. When complaints were made about Lawrence Fobes King, the lesbian VP Joy Epstein refused to expel him. 1 boy who had enough of Lawrence Fobes King’s harassment shot and killed him in class in February 2008. GLSEN saw nothing wrong with Lawrence Fobes King exposing himself and harassing others and of Lawrence Fobes King masturbating in front of other in public restroom among other things. If the school had expelled Lawrence Fobes King when complaints were made, his February 2008 killing would likely not have happened-they should have tried to help cure Lawrence Fobes King of transexuality.
Lawrence Fobes King did abuse in public restrooms. Transexuals are more likely to molest children as many transexuals were molested. We know what was reported about Lawrence Fobes King exposing himself and harassing others but it would not surprise me if Lawrence Fobes King molested children only that it went unreported as most do.
Lawrence Fobes King had harassed other boys such as Lawrence Fobes King masturbated in front of others before 1 day a boy who had enough of Lawrence Fobes King’s harassment shot and killed him in class, the judge allowed the jury to consider the lesser charge of Manslaughter, because if the judge only allowed the jury to consider Murder 1, the conviction would be reversed on appeal on the view the jury could not consider a lesser charge. The jury in the Lawrence Fobes King case came back with a hung jury-7 for Manslaughter and 5 for murder. It’s my view the case was Manslaughter, not Murder 1 and 7 jurors agreed with me. Not all murders are Murder 1 and juries must decide what charge it is if they don’t acquit. This case was manslaughter, not Murder 1 because the kid reacted to antisocial conduct which Lawrence Fobes King did but Daily Kos thinks it’s Okay for transexual Lawrence Fobes King to masturbate in front of others and again We know what was reported about Lawrence Fobes King exposing himself and harassing others but it would not surprise me if Lawrence Fobes King molested children only that it went unreported as most do.
When I read a gay (transexuals are mutilated gays/lesbians and they must abolish sex changes) bashing case in the news, I wonder what the view is of the journalist reporting this on homosexuality/lesbianism. I also wonder if the journalist is a homosexual or lesbian and if so, are they setting aside their bias and reporting the news with no problems. I do not trust news that I get from Daily Kos or the Huffington Post on their coverage of gay bashing cases because they predictably make the homosexual look like an innocent victim no matter what wrong the gay does.
ANY assault and battery or murder cases including gay bashing cases, unless there is a plea bargain (which happens in most criminal cases) juries decide after hearing both prosecutor and defense lawyer. Juries decide what is reasonable & excess because each case is different and must be judged individually. As known with murder cases, there is Murder 1, Murder 2 and Manslaughter which is a jury topic. If a defense lawyer in a gay bashing case wants to raise a crime the gay did such as harassment, indecent exposure, etc. before man reacted violently, then that must be regarded in deciding verdict. Prosecutors can argue why they think it was excess force and defense lawyer can argue why it was justified force. Jury decides if it’s justified or excess force. A jury can acquit or if they convict, they can convict a person on lesser charge.
Most gay bashings I have found are men reacting to crimes which the homosexual first did such as after a homosexual committed indecent exposure, assault & battery or other crime. I would rather have too much done than not enough in that I would rather have a case where a jury decides if a man’s reaction to bashing or killing a homosexual is justified or excess vs. the man doesn’t do enough and the gay does something worse. A rebuttal people make is that gay bashers will sometimes say things to justify their deeds such as saying the homosexual committed indecent exposure, harassment, stalking and so on and that it’s the gay basher’s side of story. Yes-but just as gay basher’s have interest to justify their deeds, gay bashing victims have interest to make themselves look like innocent victims. We don’t always know the other side of story and that is usually different from what homosexual says happened. Again if it’s true homosexual committed indecent exposure, harassment, stalking, etc. before men reacted violently, then the fact the homosexual committed a crime before he was bashed must be decided by jury in deciding if gay basher(s) used reasonable or excess force. I would rather have a case where a jury decides if a man’s reaction to bashing or killing a homosexual is justified or excess vs. the man doesn’t do enough and the gay does something worse. Most men and boys who are victims of gays usu. won’t call cops to report that a gay is committing indecent exposure, harassment or in worst cases molestation until some1 reacts violently and bashes the gay.
Something to regard-if you’re a store owner there is no need to put up signs that say ‘don’t steal’ because stealing is a crime and no need to say no to a crime the other person has no right to do. If some1 is stealing from your store, the right thing to do is use reasonable (not excess) force to stop the the thief and have the police arrest the thief. If you do nothing, then worse can happen as these situations can be unpredictable. It is possible for a thief to be stealing things anything small such as shoplifting candy to expensive things such as diamonds and then beat up or even kill the shop keeper in the same crime with or without weapons. Many cases where thieves have beaten up or killed shop keepers after stealing. No, stealing alone does not justify deadly force but theft may not be the only crime intended and it is possible for thieves to beat up or kill their victims. If the thief is high on drugs (such as a junky who steals to support his or her habit) then it is possible for the thief to be stealing things and then in a drug rage attack or even kill the store owner with his own hands.
Synonymously, if a homosexual is going to commit harassment, indecent exposure, stalking, assault and battery (such as if a homosexual grabs a man’s butt or groin against will), etc. then a man has a right to use reasonable force to end the abuse. There’s no need for a man to say no to a homosexual who is committing indecent exposure, etc. because there’s no need to say no to a crime the other had no right to as in the store owner eg.-stealing is a crime and no need to say no to thieves. If a defense lawyer in a gay bashing case wants to raise a crime the gay did such as harassment, indecent exposure, stalking, etc. before man reacted violently, then that must be regarded in deciding verdict.
We know what was reported about Lawrence Fobes King. Lawrence Fobes King masturbated in front of others & Lawrence Fobes King exposed his genitals (indecent exposure) m& harassed other boys in the bathroom. When other boys complained to their teachers about Lawrence Fobes King’s antisocial conduct, the lesbian VP Joy Epstein refused to have him expelled & she overrode the teachers. Lawrence Fobes King (Lawrence) harassed Brandon James McInerney (Brandon) by stalking Brandon such as following Brandon wherever Brandon went, even when Brandon asked him to stop following him. An eg. would be Lawrence stalking Brandon as Brandon was playing basketball.
We know what was reported. It can easily be that Lawrence Fobes King (Lawrence) also committed physical abuse (assault & battery) against Brandon James McInerney (Brandon), only that Brandon did not report this. Brandon did not report the abuse Lawrence committed because when complaints were made about Lawrence’s antisocial conduct, nothing was done. Lawrence Fobes King stalked Brandon. It would be wrong to suggest that Brandon tolerate Lawrence harassing & stalking him. Brandon shot and killed Lawrence Fobes King because he believed this is how he could end the abuse. I believe it’s manslaughter because Brandon reacted to Lawrence stalking him & it can easily be that Lawrence Fobes King also committed physical abuse against Brandon only that it went unreported. This was manslaughter & if I were on that jury I would have ruled for manslaughter. Again Lawrence Fobes King masturbated in front of others & Lawrence stalked & harassed other boys, but nothing was done to stop him. Some other thoughts to the fact that gays often molest children.
If homosexuals getting bashed and killed in unprovoked attacks was common, then it would not be in news because it would not be interesting. Going out & attacking people with no provocation is stupid but yes, there are stupid people and when this happens it is reported in news. Most domestic violence & rape/sex abuse cases do not get reported in news in most cases unless it is let’s say a famous person accused of rape or hitting his girlfriend or an unusual or strange case because there are so many of these cases that they would not be interesting.
With homosexuals, it is far more common for homosexuals to molest boys but most of these cases do not get reported in the news unless it’s a famous homosexual such as Jerry A. Sandusky. Homosexuals often target teenage boys because they think the teenage boys are easy targets to sexually abuse and some of the teenage boys fight back. Most men and boys who are victims of gays usu. won’t call cops to report that a gay is committing indecent exposure, harassment or in worst cases molestation until some1 reacts violently and bashes the gay.
A gay bashing case I know of from Arizona. What had happened was that an 18 year old boy had been in a park with friends. A gay who was much bigger than him grabbed the boy’s butt & made a sex comment. The boy then told his 2 friends. After this, the 2 men grabbed the gay, brought him to the boy who then hit the gay several times in the face. That ‘gay bashing’ victim committed a crime-assault&battery & boy reacted by bashing him. If that teenage boy had tried to walk away, that gay who was much bigger than him would likely have attacked him (possibly homosexual rape) because the gay had a violent history (unreported to cops) of beating up teenage boys after harassing them for sex & these cases unpredictable-that teenager boy would likely have ended up in the hospital. To say that ass grabbing is the only crime the gay was going to do is dishonest. Better to do too much than not enough in cases like that. With that gay, it’s highly likely the gay was trying to do something more violent than ass grabbing, so that gay deserves no sympathy for getting hit in the face.
This gay again had beaten up other teenage boys after committing assault & battery (ass grabbing), was likely trying to do it to this teenager boy, but because this teenager boy had 2 friends (1 a martial arts expert) who were with him, they were able to defend this boy before he got beaten up. If the homosexual is high on drugs (many gays drugjunkies) such as cocaine as that gay possibly was then it’s likely the gay would’ve done more violent crime in a cocaine rage if indeed the gay was high. Self-defense is a jury topic after hearing both prosecutor & defense lawyer & jury decides if gay basher used reasonable or excessive force. Most gay bashings are men reacting to crimes which the homosexual first did such as after a homosexual committed indecent exposure, assault & battery or other crime.
While harassment & indecent exposure alone does not justify killing a person, indecent exposure may not be the only crime intended. When homosexuals commit sex abuse, the first thing they do is commit indecent exposure, stalking assault and battery before doing something worse. If the homosexual is high on drugs such as Meth or Cocaine while committing indecent exposure, then it is possible for a homosexual who is committing indecent exposure to commit violence in a drug rage, even commit murder in a drug rage. There’s no need for a man to say no to a homosexual who is committing indecent exposure, etc. because there’s no need to say no to a crime the other had no right to do.
If it is true the homosexual was doing antisocial conduct before he was bashed, then yes, a jury must decide if it was justified or excess force to end the abuse. If a defense lawyer in a gay bashing case wants to raise a crime the gay did such as harassment, indecent exposure, etc. before man reacted violently, then that must be regarded in deciding verdict. I would rather have too much done than not enough in that I would rather have a case where a jury decides if a man’s reaction to bashing or killing a homosexual is justified or excess vs. the man doesn’t do enough and the gay does something worse.