(8 votes, average: 3.38 out of 6)
Loading ...Child rape is all the more horrifying when the teacher is puffy, pale and pathetic. Meet Alison Mosbeck. She is a married mother of two who is really into child rape. And being a child rapist, she decided to get a job as a teacher so she could meet some young hot meat.
From KHOU here, along with a video:
A Spring ISD teacher has been charged with having sex with a student. Alison Mosbeck was in court Monday and was released from jail after posting bonds totalling $80,000.
Three weeks ago, the Pct. 4 constable’s office received a tip that a teacher at Spring’s Dueitt Middle School was having a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old student. Following an investigation by its own police department, Spring ISD put Mosbeck on administrative leave.
Late last week, the Harris County District Attorney’s Office filed four felony charges against the 34-year-old Mosbeck, who went to work for the district two years ago. She faces one count of inappropriate relationship between teacher and student and three counts of felony sexual assault.
A probable cause affidavit says the first contact was in November of 2006. The boy told authorities that Mosbeck masturbated him in the car as they two left a community event.
That was followed by three other counts of sexual assault of a child, all within a five-month period. It included two hotel visits, where Mosbeck used her credit card to check in or registered under her own name.
Spring ISD police interviewed her, and she did not deny any of the allegations said authorities. Mosbeck has since resigned from school said Spring ISD spokeswoman Regina Curry.
A Google search of her name reveals that Alison often used her real name online for movie reviews and restaurant reviews. Her Yahoo username was alison774, and a search for that term reveals that Alison was a sucker for soap operas that involved teenager love. She also submitted a sappy valentine line for a 2005 contest that said,
“Love is not having to think about it, because you just know.”
I think its apparent that Alison did very little thinking about love. She will likely be divorced and lose custody of her children over this. But it seems she wanted to get caught. She was busted when she was sending pornographic text messages to the student, and his Mom read them. And she used her real name and credit card number to get a hotel room for her rape sessions. Not too smart for a teacher.
(A very versatile phrase!)
Related Articles
79 people responded in this post
What!!!! Do you know ms.Mosbeck!!!!NO . Heres some real info ….. Ms.Mosbeck is the most coolest teacher ever not just cuz she was fun but because she taught us what we needed to know in life and how collage depends so much on what we are doing now in middle school!She is also a great Mother and Wife. this is some thing she would never do!!!!!So next time your writing crap about someone think about what really happend a**hole!
She was NOT sending pornographic text messages. The student’s mother did not read them. The text messages were regarding the purchase of drugs. The phone was in the possession of a friend of the student at the time the messages were discovered. The step-mother of the friend notified the authorities after she read them. I guess if you don’t know the facts, it’s OK to make them up as you go along.
7thgradeDueittstudent,
Ms. Mosbeck was the most coolest child molester you ever met. Make sure that sinks into your head. And hope you never have to meet another child molester. She is a horrible mother and a worse wife and I really hope her husband takes her kids far away from her since she seems to be dangerous to children.
mommasaysimspecial,
Porn, drugs, I knew it was something illegal. The article I read didn’t specify, so thanks for clearing that up. Do you have a link to the specifics?
And she didn’t deny the allegations about the kiddie rape.
pat,
Here is a link that mentions the text message http://www.click2houston.com/news/14452531/detail.html There’s not much info on this out there, as there shouldn’t be. Still awaiting the “Do you understand the charges? How do you plea?” hearing.
7thgradeDueittstudent,
Here’s some real info for ya, Mrs. Mosbeck was mostly interested in looking cool to a bunch of children. Yes, 7th graders are children. John Wayne Gacey was a respected member of the community. Besides, he volunteered at the children’s hospital. The BTK killer, an upstanding member of community and church. Ted Bundy, a very intelligent and likable guy. Nobody wants to believe that some one they like and respect is capable of such atrocious behavior.
Thanks, Mommasays.
The relevant part of the article regarding the text message was the following:
How lame do you have to be to ask an eighth-grader about hooking you up with weed? Oh yeah, lame enough to molest little kids.
We have some more from the victim, and a statement by the lawyer in this post here:
http://www.khou.com/news/local/stories/khou071030_tj_sexscandal.1c0e743ae.html
The lawyer claims that this was a “relationship” problem. And Mosbeck is staying at her Mom’s house, so maybe her husband tossed her kid-raping ass out on the lawn.
Onion, thanks for the new info on this teacher.
Yeah… if someone is accused then they MUST be guilty!! (that logic worked for the Salem and their witch problem, right?)
Teenage kids NEVER make stuff up to get attention, do they? Especially not boys! They are always truthful about all the females they claim to their buddied they had sex with. Why would they make that up??
Yeah… last time I checked, this was America and people are innocent until proven guilty. Let’s save the “kid rapist” labels for people who’ve had the benefit of due process, you freakin’ pitchfork-yielding hillbilly morons.
Nacho,
Yeah, 21st century justice system is exactly like it was back in the 17th century.
Grow up and look at the facts. She had a credit card receipt in her name for the hotel where the victim said the crime was committed.
People are not innocent until proven guilty in this country except when judged in a court of law by a jury of their peers. The rest of the time they are open to criticism by their fellow citizens- its called the first amendment.
Hmm, seems the “victim” in question had been arrested for vandalism and at least as many as two times for drugs in the last year and was looking to make a sweet deal. Protecting kids is important, but in this case it seems the “alledged” victim is simply someone who threw someone else under a bus to save his own hide.
Springback, this is very interesting news indeed. Do you have a source for this information? And do you think that his own criminal behavior somehow lets Alison off the hook?
Otherwise, its no big shocker that kid-touching teachers are attracted to “bad boy” students. Look at the case of Kelsey Peterson, the psycho teacher who ran to Mexico with her own bad-boy-toy.
The rumors of this are spreading, pretty factual information for anyone who knows the kids. He simply chose to take advantage of someone who was kind to him. Perhaps, let’s wait till this story actually plays out before we start throwing stones. As for the young man’s criminal record, I am pretty sure at least some of that can be found by the public, however they often do hide those records making it even harder to get at the facts in a case like this where so often it is guilt-before innocence - remember the Richard Jewel case?
No, the 21st century justice system isn’t like the 17th century justice system… but the “court of public opinion,” in which you are a self-appointed judge and jury, is way worse than 17th century justice. You should go live in communist China, you’d be a good fit.
Facts? Show me the credit card receipt. Please. I’m waiting.
The news says a lot of things that are way off in this case, but the sheep-le like you just gobble it up as “facts” because it was on the news. Sounds like you are the one who needs to grow up, my naive friend. Btw… Dewey didn’t beat Truman. I know it was in the news, but you’re gonna have to trust me on this one.
I heard that Pat molests kittens. (I guess that’s true now because it’s on the internet.) You sick bastard. It’s now up to you to prove yourself innocent, otherwise I’m gonna believe you molest kittens and will use my 1st amendment rights to spread the word.
Sounds like springback is on the right track. That kid was a douchebag and a liar when I knew him as a 6th grader and I hear from others that he only got worse. He’s going to turn up in jail way before Alison makes it to trial. His criminal behavior might not let her off the hook, but the reasonable doubt created from his history of lying and committing crimes might.
Here’s the thing people refuse to understand/believe: angry kids make shit up. Ever see the South Park episode where the kids told the cops their parents “molestered” them? That episode reeked of reality. There was this one girl who was always in violation of the school dresscode, so about 3-4 times a week I sent her to “dresscode station” to get a school t-shirt. She was so mad at me that after a while she decided to spread it around that I was always looking at her breasts during class. Another girl would come to the cafeteria during breakfast and not eat, so I’d tell her to go to class. She got so mad that she told her mom that I was following her around the cafeteria and harassing her. Another time I was trying to get to the back of a row of desks to help a student with a question, but a girl in the front desk had her legs out blocking my way. I asked her to move but she refused. I told her I was going to step over her, and as I did, she raised her legs up and started screaming that I touched her when my foot hit her leg. These are the people you hippies believe when there are two versions of a story. Just like when some bored and spiteful teenagers in Salem decided to start saying “Goody Whoever cast a spell on me” and people got burned at the stake.
Look, if Alison goes to trial and gets found guilty by a jury of her peers after evidence is presented and she gets the benefit of a vigorous defense, then you guys say whatever you want. Hell… I’ll totally join you. But until then, saying she did it as if you’ve examined the evidence personally and calling her names is pretty fucking un-American. Actually… the word “libel” comes to mind. I’ve saved your page on her to my hard disk in case her lawyer is interested in adding you to the mother-of-all-civil-suits that will follow her not guilty verdict in criminal court.
Today’s justice is worse how? Mosbeck is getting the benefit of a fair trial at the public’s expense.
And yeah, bad kids do make stuff up, but during such times, it rarely goes farther than the school principal’s office.
But in Mosbeck’s case, the police department did an investigation, knowing the seriousness of the allegations. They found evidence that corroborates the victim’s story, including credit card receipts.
Don’t be stupid and ask me to show you the evidence. I’m not the police department. Don’t be mad at me because Mosbeck got arrested and fired.
And as a teacher, if you hate your students that badly, get a job doing construction or border patrol. Note the category of this post. Its “why homeschool.” A new reason is to not expose kids to asshole teachers like you.
Regarding the lawsuit? As a teacher, you don’t have the financial resources to launch a fruitless lawsuit against someone exercising their 1st amendment freedoms.
As far as the hotel stuff, I think you will find that it had nothing to do with the ‘alledged” victim. People often know where I am, guess I am just lucky non of them to date have made accusations when they knew exactly where I was. The facts will bear them self out, cracks in the story have already begun to happen and even more so alot of people around here now know about it. Like I said, it is sad that when a sensational accusation like this is made, no matter what it leaves a stain. Pat, on this one I would ease off until all things are resolved. Like I said, remember the Richard Jewel case?
Springback, a 14 year old boy taking advantage of a 32 year old, married mother with a college education? Please. I was once a horny 14 year old boy. If my 9th grade science teacher offered it, I would have hit it. As for the “arrest”. He was not arrested for vandalism. The was no arrest. The offense was tresspassing on school property. The criminal mischief was dismissed after completion of community service, Decision Making class, and 5 months probation. Since he is a minor, his criminal history is NOT a matter of public record. You mention cracks in the story, and in your prior post, you mention all the rumors. I have neither heard nor read any info on this in over a month. Seems you think you are priveledged to info the rest of us are not. Or are you simply citing the rumors you hear from 14 year old lying children? What I do know is that I am the one who read the text messages on his cel phone, my wife is the one who notified the police. Mosbeck was asking for pot. We don’t need teachers who are more interested in impressing children than educating them. You try to teach your kids not to do drugs, then their teacher is off getting high with them. Oh yes, she was a wonderful teacher, mother, wife, and an upstanding member of the community. You are so right. We need many more like her.
Mommasays,
Thanks for the comment. I’m always surprised when people want to blame the victim in sexual assault cases.
It is a long way from a text message to another charge that was made. We will see what shakes out. You kinda stopped short on the arrest record, I know he wasn’t alone when he was vandalizing the school - now was he?
Hey… R-tard Pat. You need to read posts before you reply to them. I didn’t say today’s justice is worse, I said your court of public opinion where you pass rumors off as fact is worse. Yes, Alison is getting the benefit of a fair trial, just not on the internet.
It rarely goes farther than the school principal’s office? What hole have you been living in? Innocent people have their lives destroyed all the time.
Police investigation does not equal guilty. She hasn’t even been to the grand jury yet for Christ sakes. Let’s be Americans and presume innocence until proven guilty.
Again, you show that you are talking about shit that you have no idea about. She wasn’t fired. She was on administrative leave and could have stayed on it for the rest of the school year but she resigned because even if she was innocent, she was destroyed. They didn’t have enough evidence to fire her, how are they going to have enough evidence to convict her?
Who the fuck said I hate my students? I have had over 1,000 kids in my charge over the years and 3 of them were lying sacks of crap. That doesn’t mean I hate all of them. You call me an “asshole teacher” with the same informed point of view that you call Alison names. Call me whatever you want, but I’ve got hundreds of signatures in yearbooks, home-made holidays cards, and original works of art that say otherwise.
I didn’t say that I was going to sue you, you brain dead plebeian. I said Alison’s family lawyer might want to add your ass to the civil suit. And trust me, her family has plenty of financial resources. And you should know, libel is not protected by the 1st amendment.
Tresspassing on school property? The criminal mischief? Community service? Decision Making class? 5 months probation? Sounds like a star witness to me! Tell us the rest of the story, don’t leave out so many details. What about the drugs?
So you saw a text message about drugs.. I guess that means she had sex with him! Your logic is flawless!!
I don’t know about you, but more than once I’ve accidentaly sent a text to the wrong person in my address book. I’ve also sent texts to friends that would look very bad without the benefit of tone or context. I must be a child molester then. That’s the only reasonable explanation.
Thank you for making it all so clear.
What the hell were you doing looking at your son’s friend’s text messages anyway, you sick bastard?
Nacho, why do you feel the need to blame the victim of this crime?
And why would you use the email address of josephmacfergus@aol.com , which I’m going to guess is your real name when making such a monumental ass of yourself on my blog? You seem to be a teacher in the Houston area who likes to defend kid-touching teachers. fine.
I hope your yearbook signatures and macaroni art projects hanging on your refrigerator bring you lots of comfort. But it doesnt change the fact that Alison Mosbeck was caught for sexual assault crimes.
Joe Ferguson, this is you right?
http://members.aol.com/josephmacfergus/
You seem like a good guy, and thanks for your service to the country.
But you are still just out of college and only been teaching for a short while. Too short to risk it by being abusive on a blog, especially when defending this teacher.
Me? I have no stake in Alison’s guilt or innocence insofar that she is a teacher in Texas and I’m way out in VA. She won’t molest my kid. I just like to point out that teachers assault way more kids that catholic priests ever did. But you seem to have a personal stake in this, and its one you might want to think about keeping to yourself.
So IF you don’t like a different opinion someone is posting you simply post their email address? Pat, the simple fact is this matter is far from over and dropping guilt on someone at this point is way premature. Obviously by other’s comments here, the “accuser” does have a record (yes that kids often get wiped away) and it was for vandalism - no matter whatever someone sugar coated it as (funny how their kids who were also likely involved don’t want any real blame on what they did, lol) and also there were recent drug charges. Best way to free yourself - hmm, how about a good ole fashion “plea bargain”. It would be a shame to make an innocent person suffer simply to let a guilty one off the hook. Let’s let time pass and see what happens here.
Hey Nacho,
If it’s in MY house, I am not afraid to search through it. I’m no bastard, I know my father, and he is still married to my mother. Go dry your back.
Back on the topic at hand, IMHO, she will enter a plea of no contest, never be able to teach in the state of Texas, and get 2 years probation. But… her arraignment hearing was to be November 29. Any idea on how that went?
Back to Nacho, I never said she had sex with him. Regardless, any teacher who gets high with his/her students should not be allowed near a child. It was not a case of “Whoops, I sent a text message to the wrong phone.” You are a pathetic smear of aged, whino smegma.
Springback,
I don’t typically post email addresses, but Joe was making some claims that should have been checked out. If he is a teacher that works with Alison, he shouldn’t be smearing the victim in this case. He probably shouldnt be commenting at all if he is still an employee of the school system.
And I don’t take kindly to anonymous legal threats.
Joe is a teacher at Wells Middle School.
http://classroom.springisd.org/webs/jferguso/home.htm
And it explains why he goes by “Nacho.”
Pat, the guy is like many of us out there and do not want to see someone “railroaded” on what are false accusations. Sitting up there in PA the view is alot cloudier than it is here. I, for one, am glad that someone in the teaching community has stepped foward. It is not always easy when the charges are so horrible, but setting an example to our kids that you have to stand up for what is right - even when it is hard to do, is important. The “alledged” victim is simply a vandalising drug user that after being busted one too many times thinks he has found a way out. The reason why “mommasaysimspecial” is so defensive is because he knows very well about the vandalism charges - VERY well. That isn’t missinformation, it is fact.
Springback,
No one is applauding anyone getting railroaded around here. And sure, I’m all for teachers defending their own, provided the defense is not abusive.
I have no doubt that the kid in this case is a bad kid. But I have also seen other cases where the teacher is in fact, attracted to the bad kid.
I am pretty sure the facts will bear out that “assault” info is all bogus. We will just have to wait and see.
Maybe so. If its the case, we should be hearing from lawyers for the defense about motions to dismiss.
Springback, i’m not being defensive. just stating the outcome of the court. No, he was not alone. there were 4 who tagged a school. Please do tell us about the drug charges you know about. As for the sex, there was a 3 week investigation, cel phone records, emails, myspace logs, and such. The boy didn’t go to the police with accusations, the police went to him. They felt there was enough to run with. She was not asked to resign but advised to do so by her attorney. Sex or not, she was soliciting drugs from a student and getting high with other students. She’s not somebody i want around my kids. You can let her spend time with yours.
Oh, I know your reporting it led the police to her, no doubt. The kid was backed against a wall with drug issues, that cannot be denied no matter how good of friends your child and he are. Glad you are at least trying to right the path of yours.
Okay, so lets review yours and nacho’s logic. The kid was arrested for drugs at least twice before (untrue - if he was, the courts wouldn’t have been so leanient on him for the tresspassing/criminal mischief charges). He was backed up against the wall, so he lied about the whole Mosbeck thing to avoid the drug charges knowing full well that he would be in a whole lot more trouble when the “truth” comes out at a trial. The drug charges would be reinstated, he would have purgered himself, and not to mention the civil procedings soon to follow. Since it is not a case of a child running to the cops to say, “she touched me in my private places,” but instead the cops saying there is enough evidence to follow through with, with full backing from the DA. Now, let’s go with other stuff we know (as per the news). After a 3 week investigation, she was arrested. The news reports then say that she is out on bail and due in court for her arraignment hearing on November 29. Nacho mentioned the grand jury. Normally after the grand jury, comes the arraignment. If a person admits to a crime during the police questioning, there is no longer a need for a grand jury. She did not deny the charges. I am sure that her attorney advised her to keep her mouth shut.
Of course I could be wrong. Stranger things have happened.
Springback, you obviously know who I am, if you are who I believe you are, your son’s name was mentioned during the line of questioning. And he’s not the innocent one that you believe. Don’t take it personally. If you’re not who I think you are, belay my last.
Nacho calling people a bunch of pitchfork-yielding hillbilly morons… that from a guy in a skirt driving a General Lee clone… Yee-Haww….
Oh yes, he mentions libel. I’ll mention to him, SLANDER. I wonder how the boys parents would react to his comments… I wonder how the school board would react to their teacher of the year’s comments.
Pat, why do you feel the need to violate your webpage’s “Email Address (*private)” promise whenever someone disagrees with you? That’s pretty chicken shit to use your webmaster privileges to “out” people as a weapon, but don’t have the nads to post your own personal information? Weak dude… weak.
What’s really funny is that you think I’d put my real email address. I had a feeling that you bags of shit couldn’t be trusted and if I did gave my real email you would post it to the world anyway. Seems that’s what you do when you have no real argument to present.
My apologies to Joe who is over at the other side of the district from Dueitt at Wells Middle. He never taught at Dueitt as a classroom teacher, although he used to sub at Dueitt when he was in college, but that was before Alison graced us with her presence so he didn’t really know her except for maybe an introduction at some district history teacher meeting. Now I need to contact him and let his kilt-wearin’ ass know I used him as a beard.
You ask why do I feel the need to blame the “victim” of this crime? I ask you since when does an accusation or a citizen utilizing their Miranda righs equate to quilt? This is America, damnit. You guys would fit in so much better in Iran.
You are right about me being a teacher in Houston, but the fact is that I like to defend the falsely accused. Call me crazy that way. Did you check those links I gave you? I noticed you didn’t have even one comment about those. Those are all true stories and there are millions more like them.
My yearbook signatures and macaroni art projects hanging on my refrigerator bring me TONS of comfort, actually (What do you have to show you’ve ever impacted anyone’s life?) But it is unrelated to the fact that Alison Mosbeck is innocent until proven guilty, and nothing you say will change that. As I’ve said before, if they find her guilty, then I’ll pick up the pitch-forks and storm the castle with y’all, but not a day before. That is un-American.
Even if your treacherous ass did find out who I really was, me writing on here and argueing with you is no risk to my job by any means. Here’s why:
1) I never presented myself as an employee of the school district, and never claimed to speak for the district. All I said was I was a teacher. You are the one trying to figure out where I work(ed) and force me into the “spokesman” chair.
2) Alison has not been convicted of or proven guilty of anything, so I am free to defend her “innocent until proven guilty” status all I want. It would be a different story if she confessed or was proven guilty and I defended her… but she hasn’t, so I’m all good.
3) I have a contract through the end of 2009. Before my contract can be torn up I have to be put on PAID leave while the due process hearings get lined up. I would get to stay home, sleep late, and play Xbox 360 for weeks (maybe months) while all that went down, and in the end there would be no proof that I violated the laws of Texas or the terms of my contract. I would enjoy the free paid vacation though.
You claim that “teachers assault way more kids that catholic priests ever did.” I would like to see the statistics on that. Unless you pulled it out of your ass like everything else.
The only personal stake I have is that I believe in America and what it stands for, and it makes me sick to see people shit on that and railroad people based soley on what they heard on TV.
Momma says - Fine, if it’s in YOUR house and it’s YOUR kid, do what you gotta do. But searching through other people’s kids’ stuff, is a tad on the Nazi side (or, the sick freak who gets his jollies reading through his son’s friend’s stuff side.)
I like how what was probably a joke text message to cheer a kid up after that kid got busted for drugs gets turned into “Oh Jesus, she was doing drugs with the students! AAAAH!” You people need hobbies.
You say you know your father, but I doubt it… you actually just know the guy who your mother told you and him was your father. Some poor guy who spent hundreds of thousands of dollars raising some pool boy’s son.
“Go dry my back?” Tisk, tisk… I am glad I am not arguing on the side of this racist like you are, Pat. Be careful of the company you keep.
Pat… are you really so sensitive that you don’t know the difference between friendly legal advice and “anonymous legal threats?” Sad. Very sad.
You are so full of crap, Pat. You say that no one is applauding anyone getting railroaded around here, when you are the goofy fuck in the little engineer hat tooting an imaginary horn. You even say that you’re all for teachers defending their own, provided the defense is not abusive… but you have no problem being abusive in your prosecution of a woman who has not even had the benefit of a trial yet. You should know that the way you have conducted yourself has made it impossible for me to have even a shred of respect for you.
Mommasays… your last arguement would be air-tight if you weren’t assuming that the kid with a rap sheet was someone who employed logic in his decisions. Factor that into your equations and see what you get.
Your slander warning is a little off the mark. While I mentioned before that the 1st amendment is not a defense for libel, TRUTH is a defense for slander.
As for the school board, what exactly would you tell them? “This guy who used Joe’s (a decorated combat zone veteran) email claimed online that Alison Mosbeck is innocent until proven guilty, then spoke poorly of a kid who vandalizes schools and does drugs?” I believe you would be escorted out of the meeting.
Also… teacher of the year? Joe’s still wet behind the ears, how did he get district teacher of the year in your ming? It was just like yesterday when he was in college (on his GI Bill… go ahead and try to defame that guy) subbing for us. You two have some serious fact-checking issues to work on. The teacher of the year was some lady over at Westfield High School.
Off the subject… I now feel guilty that I put Joe’s email because he had nothing to do with this (then again, it SHOULD have been safe because the site promises emails will be kept private), but I have to stick up for him on the General Lee thing. That shit is AWESOME!!
Joe,
You can claim it wasn’t you or you were using a sock puppet- whichever, your new claims that you are still somehow anonymous just doesn’t wash. I know its you.
And to praise yourself, insult yourself and then praise yourself as someone anonymous is almost as curious as your need to keep defending a child-touching teacher.
I have said before that “innocent until proven guilty” only applies to jury instructions in a court of law. It is no more unamerican for me to write about Mosbeck’s sexual perversions than it is for you to hide behind your teachers’ union job to claim you can’t be fired for speaking for the school district.
And stop calling people nazis you incompetent stooge. You should google “Godwin’s law” and see how your quick comparisons to Nazi’s mean you already lost this argument.
Its funny that liberals are always about “it takes a village to raise a child” until some villager points out that a teacher is a pervert. Then the concerned parents who do so are the jackboot thugs, nazis, fascists, etc.
You’ve left me with no choice to be anonymous since you can’t be trusted to keep your word to honor commentators’ privacy.
Blame Joe all you want, doesn’t bother me. It should actually turn out quite funny.
You are not a very good reader, are you? I said pretty specifically that I never claimed to ever be affiliated with the district, and I still haven’t. So I am in the clear.
You are all Nazis. “Guilty because I heard about it on TV until proven innocent” was my first sign.
You morons have no concept of the difference between defending a person’s presumption of innocence and defending what that person is accused of. They are not on ein the same. Do your best to rap your feeble minds around that.
I just realized you have yet to address the following:
1) The cowardly way you broke your email(*private) promise just to try to get even with someone.
2) The links I sent about teachers being fasly accused
3) Oh, wait… those links I provided ARE GONE! I don’t fucking believe you went back and edited my post because it made too good of a point against you. You are one pathetic sack of crap.
You asked for statistics on teachers raping more kids than catholic priests ever did. Its at a ratio of 100 to 1.
Joe, regarding your lame ass links about students lying about teachers, you provided exactly 3. 2 of which were in the UK. You will have to be more substantive than that to get me to let you post your propaganda.
You want lists? Here is a list.
Notice your kid-touching friend tops it.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53859
My problem with this blog, like most, that they are done without the full body of the evidence and they judge immediatley. Many of the charges in this case will prove false over time, yet this site irresponsibly post it as factual guilt - huge difference. But hey, it is your website, post that the moon is made of cheese if you so choose - nothing here has to be proven to be posted. Funny, EVERYTHING I have posted here has been fact.
Joe aka Nacho,
You continue to be abusive and I have placed your comments in moderation.
If you want a soapbox to spout your angry hatred toward christians, try using your own website.
Nacho,
Your arguments would be more credible if you wouldn’t resort to the same tactics of a child, name calling. Go dry your back could be implying that you just got out of the shower, and I wouldn’t want you to catch cold. So, prove I am a racist. A decorating veteran… whoopee… can’t swing a dead cat without hitting one. They are everywhere. I wouldn’t have gone through his text messages if 1) phone was not in the possession of my son, 2) there was no reason to 3) or if it was locked. I am not on the jury and will not be on the jury, therefore, I do not have to assume she is innocent. Next you will be saying it could have been one of her daughters using the phone. If it resulted in his arrest, you would be the first one to cheer about t it. Since his name has not been released to the public, and will not for at least 3 more years, you do not know for sure who the individual involved is. You are going by the rumors of lying children. Springback, can you prove your allegations about the drug charges? Are you going by the rumors of children as well? Or the rumors of adults? Regardless, they are rumors. Provide me with proof. I would love to know. Are you saying that you should be believed simply because you say it? Bottom line, I know what I read, YOU do not. Did she have sexual relations with a 14 year old? There are only 2 people who can answer that, I am not one of those, and neither are you. If she wants to smoke pot, fine. If she wants wants to star in a bukake movie, fine. If she wants to do a donkey show in Tijuana, who cares. But when she involves a student, there is a problem. Springback, If you are who I think you are, didn’t your son run with the alledged victim as well?
Good day.
Excuse me, Texas History Teacher of the Year.
Here we go. progress http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=5793291&ft=sm
Hello Grand Jury-
A grand jury will decide if there’s enough evidence against a former middle school teacher accused of having sex with a student.
Alison Mosbeck appeared in court today. Prosecutors say she had sex with a seventh grader while she was a teacher at Dueitt Middle School in Spring. The case is being referred to a grand jury.
Hello coward who deletes other people’s posts because he is a scared little baby with the inability to retort verbally.
It’s less “progress” and more “old news.” There hasn’t even been a judging of the evidence yet but Pat wants to go ahead and crucify her anyway.
What a commie.
It is moving forward, therefore, it is progress. It is as well, old news. Since it was buried on one news website, not a mention of it was made in the news (if it was, I missed it), and 10 or so pages into a google search, it is nonetheless, news to me. January 28 is the day.
Since you start your “arguments” with name calling, and finish with name calling, how can you be taken seriously? Funny, you lie about who you are and claim to have “borrowed” somebody’s identity (should have used a bogus email addy, not a “borrowed” one) and you call the person you assume to be the alleged victim a liar and a douchebag.
Communism is defined as “A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members,” how does ones opinion of the alleged rapist make him/her a commie?
NAZI is the German National Socialist Worker’s Party, I am neither German nor socialist.
It seems that whoever has a different opinion of yours, is a (expletive goes here).
Good Day
Joe Ferguson,
I keep checking your AOL homepage to see if you setup your own little shrine to kid-touching teachers yet, but you haven’t. Why is that? You keep trying to post a stupid list of links, so post them on your own site.
Ok…Mr. Joe Ferguson…heres the story…from the victim…since ya know im a lying douchebag…you dont have to believe me…but i really dont give a rats ass what you think…yeah she touched me…i dont care…we had sex…and she was guilty…ive already told the cops i was high…and i get high…they know…but i wasnt using that to cover up…thats crap…sir…you are a moron…i dont cover up my messes…i never have…if i get busted…i admit it…i did it during my criminal mischeif charges…and of course my drug charges that dont exist…too bad ive never been caught…so…Mr. Joe Ferguson…i would really appreciate it if you would actually come to either the source…or a friend of maybe…
‡FEFF‡
Listen i knew mrs.mosbeck too and no mater how cool she was she still did what she did and thats still messed up and i still can’t believe it happened
What happened happened…the argument is over…i want my phone back already…
They kept your phone as evidence? That doesn’t seem right. They should have been able to validate the data they needed and return the device to you.
Yeah…and they still have it…isnt the case over? If so…im gonna have to get a ride up to the Police station and get it back…
Pretty sure he knows exactly where they police station is. Do you have a frequent flyer card? Honesty really isn’t his strong suit, but I am sure that will all come out sooner or later.
Blow me…ive been to the station once…because of the interview…ive never been in a cop car…nor have i been busted for drugs…and NO…i dont know where it is…thats why ill ask my mother to take me there…
Prett sure we can all see now what we are dealing with. You are a fine human being, FEFF.
Damn, Spring ISD sure is busy…
Mommasays,
Awesome link. I put the story in your comment since the url was somehow faulty. The story is a little short on details, but I may do some digging and see what I find out.
Yes Springback…i am a fine human being…but you’ve got your head so far up your ass you cant see that…
Acording to my source, there will be no GJ. The DA felt there was enough of a case to proceed without one. The trial is to be January 17, 2008. Her attorney is a court appointed attorney. Hmmmmmm… Nacho, tell us again how much money her family has to get the best defense available. Was Chris Tritico busy? My source could be incorrect about the GJ. I guess we shall see in about 3 more weeks.
Momma,
Shouldn’t there be preliminary motions to dismiss if she was clearly innocent? Then again, if the evidence was really strong she would be plea bargaining if the DA would let her.
I googled Chris Tritico. What a freakin’ winner he seems to be. Card carryin’ ACLU liberal.
I would respond, but Pat is a baby and deletes everything I write. What a coward.
Perhaps if you could present an argument, or a comment instead of resorting to name-calling. I figured a man with an education could do just that, whereas every post of yours is nothing but childish tactics.
what if the kid was bribed or something?
something like “14 y/o kid gets oral for free A” or some shit like that…?
you hear about that shit all the time. oh well, sex is sex, its not going 2 un-sex itself. maybe alison likes small cock? so what? stop talking shit unless you personally get facts from the victim (yer welcome red…)
Your facts posted here or so way off base, LOL. Who knows, maybe the “alledged” victim is simple a peice of trash who smokes alot of pot. Maybe? Maybe the trial doesn’t actually start in January? As usually, just like the truth, it is most vacant on this - a blog where anyone can post anything and it has nothing to do with the truth. The truth will show itself in time. Mommy, your facts are pretty far off, well, I guess they really aren’t facts, now are they? Double trouble I see has his little buddies now posting in here upon his direction, lol. Well, I bid you all adu as I thought this site may may post some real insite but apparently is nothing more than garbage and bashing at a “sensational” news item when all most people want is the truth - and they won’t find that here.
Spring, please enlighten me as to where my facts are far off. The facts I mentioned: 1)I read drug related text messages on the alleged victims phone sent by the phone of Alison Mosbeck 2) The alleged victim is 15 3)There was a 3 week long investigation 4)there was enough evidence to pursue a minimum of 4 felony counts 5)the alleged victim’s only courtroom experience and subsequent punishment 6)I was in the room with the first witness at the first interview regarding this whole mess 7)the alleged victim’s name has not been released to the public, nor will it be for at least 3 years.
Nowhere did I accuse Mosbeck of anything other than wanting to look cool to her students and getting high with them. No court or law enforcement official will change my opinion of that.
You and nacho/nachito/pendejo/joe/whatever he chooses to call himself these days are going by rumor and hearsay. Unless you are now or were involved in the original investigation, you don’t know anything other than what you have either heard or assumed.
Nacho/nachito/whatever has done nothing but call anyone who has a different opinion of him an expletive. He says jurors are too stupid to get out of jury duty. That right there says he has no faith in the judicial process. He calls the alleged victim a liar and a douchebag, yet he used somebody elses email address. That says that he himself is a liar and a coward. I won’t call him a douchebag because it is physically impossible for a human to be a douchebag. The only way he thinks he can “defend” her presumption of innocence is to marginalize the alleged victim.
I have no opinion as to the sexual allegations. When/if I see the evidence, I will have an opinion.
Something tells me that if she pleads guilty or no contest, you and nacho will say she only did that to protect the youth involved from the trauma of court. If she is found guilty by a jury of 12 people, you will say, “Jurors are stupid,” or “The defense blew it,” or “just because they found her guilty, doesn’t mean sh*t. She’s innocent.” If she is found not guilty by a jury of 12, you will say “I told you so. The system works.”
Don’t lie to yourself, a jury is not always correct. A jury only represents the opinion of 12 people. Innocents are found guilty, and the guilty are aquitted.
Since you know me, feel free to call me, stop by, talk to me at Kroger’s, talk to me at a Dueitt Middle School choir concert. Hopefully the next one won’t be as painful as the last one. My ears are still bleeding.
No matter the outcome, I have no regrets for reading the text messages or turning them over to the authorities. Perhaps one day, you will be able to read them and come to your own conclusion. After the trial, you can always obtain the court records (censored of the names of minors of course) through the FIA.
So please, tell me where my facts have been off. My opinions may be off, but my facts are not. Where I give my opinion, I tell you. IMHO means “In My Humble Opinion,” not “I’M a HO.” You have not offered any facts. Facts are easily proven. Opinions are based on facts, rumors, hearsay, personal prejudices, etc. and are not always wrong, but not easily proven to be correct. Make a list of your facts and post them.
BTW (By The Way), it’s spelled ADIEU not ADU
Regards and Merry Christmas
[...] The previously highlighted skeevy kid-touching teacher from Spring ISD, Alison Mosbeck was featured on this site here. [...]
Wow, what is up with teachers at Spring? They are ugly, very horny, and constantly blowing kiddie bones.
Now Shannon Hrozek, an english teacher at Westfield was caught with kiddie parts in her mouth in her english class.
“Alison Mosbeck, who taught history at Dueitt Middle School, was charged in late October with three cases of sexual assault of a child and one case of an improper relationship with a student. Mosbeck has since resigned. She’s scheduled to appear in court Jan. 17.” That is from the Houston Barnacle. I do believe I said that on Dec 21, 2007. The article is dated Jan 9, 2008.
Here’s the link - http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nb/spring/news/5439174.html
Momma, if you hear how the court date went, please let us know.
Pat,
You know I will. I am sure there will be a couple of other people who will reappear on this blog as well.
“Alison Mosbeck’s case was reset until next month for a grand jury to review.
Mosebeck, 33, was a history teacher at Dueitt Middle School. Prosecutors said she started her relationship with the student about a year ago; he’s now 14 years old.
Mosbeck has since resigned. The student wsa transferred to another school.”
http://www.khou.com/news/local/houstonmetro/stories/khou080117_ac_dueittms.2fdb8254.html
A couple of corrections… Mosebeck should be Mosbeck, wsa should be was, and the student in now 15 years old. They make it sound like he was forcibly transferred, he was not. He moved in with his mom who is in a different district.
KHOU seems to be the only news source following this.
So…am i going to get my phone from the DA after this trial?
FEFF!!!,
What comes next, is a grand jury. They will deliver a “true bill” or a “no bill”. If they deliver a “true bill”, then comes a hearing, then a trial (if she pleas not guilty). At the end of that, you might get your phone back. An aquittal will be the end of it. If she is found guilty, there will be appeals. If they deliver a “no bill”, depending on the DA, that’s either the end of it, or they will send it to a grand jury again. If they end it, you should get your phone back.
Personally, I think you should be able to get your phone back now. They have all the records and transcripts by now.
So whats the aftermath of this incident? Havent seen anything new on the media lately. Could be she’s still at large? heh..
Want to Say Something?
Your comments are appreciated. And don't forget to rate the post!