BelchSpeak

I can't believe that came from your mouth!

CrimeStupid People

Duke Lacrosse Whore Not Sure She was Raped

The whore who accused the Duke Lacrosse players of raping her finally changed her mind and decided that maybe she might not have been raped. The prosecutor, Mike Nifong, will drop the charges of rape against the Lacrosse players, but will still pursue charges of kidnapping and sexual assault.

From the AP here:

Prosecutors dropped rape charges Friday against three Duke University lacrosse players accused of attacking a stripper at a team party, but the three still face kidnapping and sexual offense charges, a defense attorney said.

Joseph Cheshire and attorneys for the other players have said for months the woman told several different versions of the alleged assault.

Cheshire said Friday that the accuser now says she does not know if she was penetrated, which he said led District Attorney Mike Nifong to dismiss the rape charges.

The players Dave Evans, Collin Finnerty and Reade Seligmann all say they are innocent.

The stupid whore seemed to know she was penetrated when she filed the charges. She was getting plenty of penetration according to the evidence, but she must have confused the Duke Lacrosse party with another gang bang. With so much sperm from so many men swishing around in her womb, she must have sounded like someone shaking a carton of Egg Nog when she danced.

The players should immediately sue Janette Rivers for falsely accusing them of rape and nearly ruining their lives. And while they are at it, they need to sue to get back the 400 bucks they spent for a strip show that she was too stoned to do.

Dr. Jones

Do not talk about fight club. Oops.

One thought on “Duke Lacrosse Whore Not Sure She was Raped

  • Bhattacharya

    Have been to rape/sex abuse trials, so know what the prosecutor will say, what the defense lawyer will say, etc. It’s possible to do a rape trial w/o calling the victim. If a prosecutor believes they can convict w/o the victim testifying, they can do so. It’s for a jury to decide if proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. Rape cases are almost always he says she says such as date & marital rapes, with the woman saying that the man forced her to have sex while the man says that the woman agreed, doing the acts that she agreed to while not doing what she or he said no to. It’s possible for a woman or man to 1st agree to have sex but then change mind & say no. It’s also possible for a woman or man to 1st say no but then voluntarily change mind & decide to have sex. & it’s possible for a woman or man to say no to 1 sex act but agree to another. Not to be graphic, but if a woman were to ask a man if he could do oral on her, there are many men who would say ‘no, just normal activities’. In this case, the man wants to have penis/vaginal sex with her but he does not want to do oral sex. Rape cases must be judged by juries in deciding which story is credible.

    Crystal Gail Mangum’s a junky who used crack, drunk driving and she had drug/alcohol problems. If she had been prosecuted and convicted of being a false accuser, then it’s possible the man she killed would still be alive today. She only got 88 days in jail for her 2010 child abuse conviction when she should have gotten more punishment. Crystal Gail Mangum had problems long before her Duke accusation and her problems worsened after. There are people who side with Crystal Gail Mangum even after it was proven she lied.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *